Monitoring the development of investigations using libertine granules

I am currently creating an OWL ontology which until recently was quickly classified using the Pellet method. However, since the introduction of several new classes, the reasoning efficiency has slowed down to a workaround. Even though the reasoning ends and the ontology does not contain any unsatisfactory concepts, etc., the time that the argument takes is not acceptable. I am currently trying to track down classes / classes that might be causing the slowdown.

Here's my question: is it possible to add a logical progression to Pelle? That is, is it possible to derive some kind of result that will document how long the trawl has spent on certain argumentation problems / keeps track of how long it takes to reason about a given class and axiom? If so, does anyone have some Java code they could submit?

Thanks in advance for your answers!

+2


a source to share


2 answers


Bill Barnhill provided an incredibly helpful answer to this question over the Semantic Overflow. Please go ahead!



+2


a source


Have you tried using the Pellet lint tool to diagnose poor performance? You would also be lucky to get an answer to this question by posting it on the pellet user mailing list, including the ontology that is causing the problem or some subsets that can be used to reproduce the slowness. You also don't say which version you are using, etc.



0


a source







All Articles